‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, July 2nd, 2021 at 03:10, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:10:17PM +0000, gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
>
> > Micheal suggested on the same thread to move my entry in the help output so
> > that
> >
> > the output remains ordered. I would like the options for the compression
> > method and
> >
> > the already existing compression level to next to each other if possible.
> > Then it
> >
> > should be either 'X' or 'Y'.
>
> Hmm. Grouping these together makes sense for the user. One choice
>
> that we have here is to drop the short option, and just use a long
>
> one. What I think is important for the user when it comes to this
>
> option is the consistency of its naming across all the tools
>
> supporting it. pg_dump and pg_basebackup, where we could plug LZ4,
>
> already use most of the short options you could use for pg_receivewal,
>
> having only a long one gives a bit more flexibility.
Good point. I am going with that one.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Michael
