Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> I agree with those -- either we remove the ability to choose random source
> independently of the SSL library (and then only use the windows crypto
> provider or /dev/urandom as platform-specific choices when *no* SSL library
> is used), and in that case we should not have separate #ifdef's for them.
> Or we fix the includes. Which is obviously easier, but we should take the
> time to do what we think is right long-term of course.
FWIW, I'd vote for the former. I think the presumption that OpenSSL's
random-number machinery can be used without any other initialization is
shaky as heck.
regards, tom lane
