Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> I think the defensive-in-code instead of defensive-in-docs is a really
> strong argument, so I have pushed it as such.
I notice warnings that I think are caused by this patch on some buildfarm
members, eg
drongo | 2020-11-15 06:59:05 |
C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\src\port\pg_strong_random.c(96,11): warning
C4013: 'RAND_poll' undefined; assuming extern returning int
[C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\postgres.vcxproj]
drongo | 2020-11-15 06:59:05 |
C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\src\port\pg_strong_random.c(96,11): warning
C4013: 'RAND_poll' undefined; assuming extern returning int
[C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\libpgport.vcxproj]
drongo | 2020-11-15 06:59:05 |
C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\src\port\pg_strong_random.c(96,11): warning
C4013: 'RAND_poll' undefined; assuming extern returning int
[C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\postgres.vcxproj]
drongo | 2020-11-15 06:59:05 |
C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\src\port\pg_strong_random.c(96,11): warning
C4013: 'RAND_poll' undefined; assuming extern returning int
[C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\libpgport.vcxproj]
(bowerbird and hamerkop are showing the same).
My first thought about it was that this bit is busted:
+#ifndef USE_OPENSSL
+ RAND_poll();
+#endif
The obvious problem with this is that if !USE_OPENSSL, we will not have
pulled in openssl's headers.
However ... all these machines are pointing at line 96, which is not
that one but the one under "#if defined(USE_OPENSSL)". So I'm not sure
what to make of that, except that a bit more finesse seems required.
regards, tom lane
