On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 09:59:51AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Patch looks good to me, please push.
Thanks, applied without the calls to set_pglocale_pgservice(). > Generally speaking I find the 'progname' handling a bit silly (since we > have it both as a variable in each program and also in logging.c > separately), but that's not the fault of this patch, and this patch > doesn't make it worse. That said, I think some other messages in > vacuumlo can be made pg_log_somelevel(), based on occurrences of > 'progname'. That would mean moving some of the messages from stdout to stderr. We could do that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
