Hi, Tsunakawa-san. > From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki [mailto:tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com] > I think that's for the case where the modules is built on an OS that > supports TCP_USER_TIMEOUT (#ifdef TCP_USER_TIMEOUT is true), and the > module is used on an older OS that doesn't support TCP_USER_TIMEOUT. I > remember I was sometimes able to do such a thing on Linux and Solaris. > If we don't have to handle such usage, I agree about removing the special > handling of ENOTPROTO. I don't know how much there are such systems, but your story feels remote for me. Therefore I adopted Horiguchi-san's idea.
Best regards, --------------------- Ryohei Nagaura
