From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com] > I don't think so. I think it's just a weirdly-design parameter > without a really compelling use case. Enforcing limits on the value > of the parameter doesn't fix that. Most of the reviewers who have > opined so far have been somewhere between cautious and negative about > the value of that parameter, so I think we should just not add it. At > least for now.
I don't think socket_timeout is so bad. I think Nagaura-san and I presented the use case, giving an answer to every question and concern. OTOH, it may be better to commit the tcp_user_timeout patch when Nagaura-san has refined the documentation, and then continue socket_timeout. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
