Jamison, Kirk wrote: > On February 1, 2019, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > > > > As most people seem to agree adding the reloption, here's the patch. > > > It passes make check, and works like this: > > Sorry, I forgot to include the modified header file. Revised patch > > attached. > > I wonder if there is a better reloption name for shrink_enabled. > (truncate_enabled, vacuum_enabled? Hmm. No?) > On the other hand, shrink_enabled seems to describe well what it's supposed > to do when vacuuming tables. > Besides there's a similarly-named autovacuum_enabled option.
I like "shrink_enabled". It may sound weird in the ears of PostgreSQL hackers, but will make sense to users. Perhaps "vacuum_shrink_enabled" would be even better. Yours, Laurenz Albe
