From: Jamison, Kirk/ジャミソン カーク > I wonder if there is a better reloption name for shrink_enabled. > (truncate_enabled, vacuum_enabled? Hmm. No?) > On the other hand, shrink_enabled seems to describe well what it's supposed > to do when vacuuming tables. > Besides there's a similarly-named autovacuum_enabled option.
Yeah, I used vacuum_truncation_enabled at first. But I thought shrink is better because it represents the final effect from the user perspective, while truncation is the system action to reach the desired state. > I think if most seem to agree to have this solution in place > and to review this further and cover what might be missing, > then shall we register this to next CF? I've already done it. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
