pgsql-hackers  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Use WALReadFromBuffers in more places Michael Paquier
  • Re: Use WALReadFromBuffers in more places Bharath Rupireddy
  • Re: Use WALReadFromBuffers in more places Michael Paquier
• Re: [Patch] Omit virtual generated columns from test_decoding output Masahiko Sawada
  • Re: [Patch] Omit virtual generated columns from test_decoding output Bharath Rupireddy
  • Re: [Patch] Omit virtual generated columns from test_decoding output Euler Taveira
  • Re: [Patch] Omit virtual generated columns from test_decoding output Bharath Rupireddy
  • Re: [Patch] Omit virtual generated columns from test_decoding output Masahiko Sawada
  • Re: [Patch] Omit virtual generated columns from test_decoding output Euler Taveira
  • Re: [Patch] Omit virtual generated columns from test_decoding output Masahiko Sawada
• Re: [PATCH] Speed up repeat() for larger counts Jan Nidzwetzki
• Re: BgBufferSync(): clarification about reusable_buffers variable Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: BgBufferSync(): clarification about reusable_buffers variable Ashutosh Bapat
• Re: Infinite Autovacuum loop caused by failing virtual generated column expression Bharath Rupireddy
• Re: Add autovacuum_warning to surface concurrent vacuum collisions Bharath Rupireddy
  • Re: Add autovacuum_warning to surface concurrent vacuum collisions Shinya Kato
• Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart Palak Chaturvedi
  • Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart Palak Chaturvedi
  • Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart Yuhang Qiu
  • Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart Palak Chaturvedi
  • Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart Yuhang Qiu
• macOS + gcc + meson + --werror is broken Peter Eisentraut
• Re: Possible Visibility Map corruption in supported branches? Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
  • Re: Possible Visibility Map corruption in supported branches? Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
• pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Zsolt Parragi
  • Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Nazir Bilal Yavuz
  • Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Michael Paquier
  • Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Zsolt Parragi
  • Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Michael Paquier
  • Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Michael Paquier
  • Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Zsolt Parragi
  • Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures misses single-page failures in backups Michael Paquier
• Re: [PATCH] ternary reloption type Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: [PATCH] ternary reloption type Nikolay Shaplov
  • Re: [PATCH] ternary reloption type Álvaro Herrera
• Re: Fix XLogFileReadAnyTLI silently applying divergent WAL from wrong timeline Stepan Tyagushev
  • Re: Fix XLogFileReadAnyTLI silently applying divergent WAL from wrong timeline Andrey Borodin
  • Re: Fix XLogFileReadAnyTLI silently applying divergent WAL from wrong timeline Andrey Borodin
  • Re: Fix XLogFileReadAnyTLI silently applying divergent WAL from wrong timeline surya poondla
  • Re: Fix XLogFileReadAnyTLI silently applying divergent WAL from wrong timeline Andrey Borodin
• Re: [WIP] Pipelined Recovery Nitin Jadhav
  • Re: [WIP] Pipelined Recovery Xuneng Zhou
  • Re: [WIP] Pipelined Recovery Jakub Wartak
  • Re: [WIP] Pipelined Recovery Nitin Jadhav
• Document that jsonpath == can be used as ANY Marcos Pegoraro
• apply worker misses closing partition leaves Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
  • Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves David Rowley
  • RE: apply worker misses closing partition leaves Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
  • Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves David Rowley
  • RE: apply worker misses closing partition leaves Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
  • RE: apply worker misses closing partition leaves Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
  • Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves David Rowley
• Apply extended statistics to join clause during parameterized path costing Ilia Evdokimov
  • Re: Apply extended statistics to join clause during parameterized path costing Tomas Vondra
• Reduce SyncRepLock contention on the commit path Vadim Ponomarev
• PostgreSQL does not propagate empty inputs through INTERSECT and EXCEPT 陈列行
  • Re: PostgreSQL does not propagate empty inputs through INTERSECT and EXCEPT David Rowley
• Semantically redundant OR FALSE prevents IN-subquery pull-up and causes a slower SubPlan 陈列行
• redundant double negation prevents IN-subquery pull-up and causes a slower SubPlan 陈列行
  • Re: redundant double negation prevents IN-subquery pull-up and causes a slower SubPlan David Rowley
  • Re: redundant double negation prevents IN-subquery pull-up and causes a slower SubPlan Tom Lane
• Redundant outer DISTINCT adds Sort and Unique above EXCEPT 陈列行
• Switch opclass option functions to be STRICT (currently non-STRICT) Michael Paquier
  • Re: Switch opclass option functions to be STRICT (currently non-STRICT) Tom Lane
  • Re: Switch opclass option functions to be STRICT (currently non-STRICT) Michael Paquier
• Redundant outer DISTINCT adds Sort and Unique above INTERSECT 陈列行
• Duplicating an equivalent ANY predicate changes a semijoin into a slower per-row SubPlan 陈列行
• Semantically redundant DISTINCT in an IN subquery changes the join strategy and improves execution 陈列行
• Dropping a composite attribute causes data integrity violations Nikhil Sontakke
  • Re: Dropping a composite attribute causes data integrity violations Nikhil Sontakke
• [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths Tender Wang
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths Richard Guo
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths David Rowley
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths Richard Guo
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths David Rowley
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths Richard Guo
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths Tender Wang
• [PATCH] Fix use-after-free after failed pg_checksum_init Grigorev Jurij
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix use-after-free after failed pg_checksum_init Daniel Gustafsson
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix use-after-free after failed pg_checksum_init Grigorev Jurij
• Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Andrei Lepikhov
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate David Rowley
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Andrei Lepikhov
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Andrei Lepikhov
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Tom Lane
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Andrei Lepikhov
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Tom Lane
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Tom Lane
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Andrei Lepikhov
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Tom Lane
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Andrei Lepikhov
  • Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate Tom Lane
• Re: Add XMLNamespaces to XMLElement solai v
• Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins wenhui qiu
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Ayush Tiwari
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Ayush Tiwari
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Haibo Yan
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Haibo Yan
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins wenhui qiu
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Haibo Yan
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Haibo Yan
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins wenhui qiu
  • Re: Fix CPU cost of right-semi and right-anti hash joins Richard Guo
• Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tender Wang
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tender Wang
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tender Wang
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Tom Lane
  • Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 Richard Guo
• Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Tom Lane
  • Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl Andrey Rachitskiy
• Residual tsquery cleanups Tom Lane
  • pg_upgrade from pg19 source build to pg19-beta3 throws an error mailinglists
  • Re: pg_upgrade from pg19 source build to pg19-beta3 throws an error Tom Lane
  • Re: pg_upgrade from pg19 source build to pg19-beta3 throws an error mailinglists
  • Re: Residual tsquery cleanups Chao Li
  • Re: Residual tsquery cleanups Tom Lane
• Re: examine_variable ignored CollateExpr ZizhuanLiu X-MAN
  • Re: examine_variable ignored CollateExpr Tom Lane
  • Re: examine_variable ignored CollateExpr ZizhuanLiu X-MAN
  • Re: examine_variable ignored CollateExpr ZizhuanLiu X-MAN
• pgcrypto.sgml: built in -> built-in Erik Rijkers
  • Re: pgcrypto.sgml: built in -> built-in Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: pgcrypto.sgml: built in -> built-in Daniel Gustafsson
  • Re: pgcrypto.sgml: built in -> built-in Daniel Gustafsson
• [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG Tatsuya Kawata
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG Michael Paquier
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG Tom Lane
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG Michael Paquier
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG Tom Lane
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG Tatsuya Kawata
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG Michael Paquier
• [PATCH] Add memory/disk usage for Function Scan nodes in EXPLAIN Tatsuya Kawata
  • Re: [PATCH] Add memory/disk usage for Function Scan nodes in EXPLAIN Shashishekar Hullahally Anantharamu
• psql \d+ shows "Replica Identity: ???" for REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING Shinya Kato
  • Re: psql \d+ shows "Replica Identity: ???" for REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING Michael Paquier
  • Re: psql \d+ shows "Replica Identity: ???" for REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING Michael Paquier
  • Re: psql \d+ shows "Replica Identity: ???" for REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING Shinya Kato
• Request to expedite CommitFest account cool-off period sahil verma
  • Re: Request to expedite CommitFest account cool-off period Álvaro Herrera
• GiST wal_consistency_checking issue Peter Geoghegan
  • Re: GiST wal_consistency_checking issue Michael Paquier
  • Re: GiST wal_consistency_checking issue Peter Geoghegan
  • Re: GiST wal_consistency_checking issue Michael Paquier
• gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan Peter Geoghegan
  • Re: gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan Michael Paquier
  • Re: gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan Peter Geoghegan
  • Re: gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan Michael Paquier
  • Re: gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan Andrey Borodin

• Earlier messages
• Later messages