Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:39 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think the problem is not so much the underscore as the
>> inconsistency. You've got "pub", "gen", and "cols" run together,
>> but then you feel a need to separate "type"?
> It was easy to read and to avoid getting a single word too long.
> However, I do understand your concern. so will change it to
> pubgencolstype unless you or someone prefers pubgencols?
I think I'd vote for "pubgencols". I don't see what the "_type"
suffix is supposed to convey --- there is nothing very type-y about
this.
regards, tom lane
