On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:39 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 4:41 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> However, in hindsight, I am not sure that the column should have been > >> renamed 'pubgencols_type' in the first place because I cannot find any > >> other catalogs with an underscore in their column names. > > > See pg_rewrite.ev_type for a similar case. > > I think the problem is not so much the underscore as the > inconsistency. You've got "pub", "gen", and "cols" run together, > but then you feel a need to separate "type"? >
It was easy to read and to avoid getting a single word too long. However, I do understand your concern. so will change it to pubgencolstype unless you or someone prefers pubgencols? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
