On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 17:21, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 11:04 AM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Determining the correct time may be challenging for users, as it
> > depends on when the active_since value is set, as well as when the
> > checkpoint_timeout occurs and the subsequent checkpoint is triggered.
> > Even if the user sets it to an appropriate value, there is still a
> > possibility of delayed identification due to the timing of when the
> > slot's active_timeout is being set. Including this information in the
> > documentation should be sufficient.
> >
>
> +1
> v54 documents this information as suggested.
>
> Attached the v54 patch-set addressing all the comments till now in
> [1], [2] and [3].
Now that we support idle_replication_slot_timeout in milliseconds, we
can set this value from 1s to 1ms or 10millseconds and change sleep to
usleep, this will bring down the test execution time significantly:
+# Set timeout GUC on the standby to verify that the next checkpoint will not
+# invalidate synced slots.
+my $idle_timeout_1s = 1;
+$standby1->safe_psql(
+ 'postgres', qq[
+ ALTER SYSTEM SET idle_replication_slot_timeout TO '${idle_timeout_1s}s';
+]);
+$standby1->reload;
+
+# Sync the primary slots to the standby
+$standby1->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT pg_sync_replication_slots();");
+
+# Confirm that the logical failover slot is created on the standby
+is( $standby1->safe_psql(
+ 'postgres',
+ q{SELECT count(*) = 1 FROM pg_replication_slots
+ WHERE slot_name = 'sync_slot1' AND synced
+ AND NOT temporary
+ AND invalidation_reason IS NULL;}
+ ),
+ "t",
+ 'logical slot sync_slot1 is synced to standby');
+
+# Give enough time for inactive_since to exceed the timeout
+sleep($idle_timeout_1s + 1);
Regards,
Vignesh
