On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 06:42:10AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan > <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we >> can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we >> haven't had complaints. > > What's wrong with the approach proposed in > http://postgr.es/m/55afc302.1060...@iki.fi ?
For back-branches that's very invasive so that seems risky to me particularly seeing the low number of complaints on the matter. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
