On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we > can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we > haven't had complaints.
What's wrong with the approach proposed in http://postgr.es/m/55afc302.1060...@iki.fi ? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
