On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 6:46 PM John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > It might least be good for readability to gloss over the warning and only > quote the MXID limit error message, but we'll have to see how it looks.
Apparently you expect me to join you in pretending that you didn't lambast my review on this thread less than 24 hours ago [1]. I happen to believe that this particular patch is of great strategic importance, so I'll admit that I thought about it for a second. But just a second -- I have more self-respect than that. That's not the only reason, though. I also genuinely don't have the foggiest notion what was behind what you said. In particular, this part still makes zero sense to me: "Claim that others are holding you back, and then try to move the goalposts in their work" Let me get this straight: "Moving the goalposts of their work" refers to something *I* did to *you*, on *this* thread...right? If anything, I'm biased in *favor* of this patch. The fact that you seem to think that I was being obstructionist just doesn't make any sense to me, at all. I really don't know where to go from there. I'm not so much upset as baffled. [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsGJMp43QO2cLAh0==ueYVL35pbbEHeXZ0cnZkU=q8s...@mail.gmail.com -- Peter Geoghegan
