On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:55 AM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:34 AM John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > 0003 is now a quick-and-dirty attempt at that, only in the docs. The MXID part is mostly copy-pasted from the XID part, just to get something together. I'd like to abbreviate that somehow. > > Yeah, the need to abbreviate statements about MultiXact IDs by saying > that they work analogously to XIDs in some particular respect > is...another thing that makes this tricky. Then it sounds like they should stay separate. A direct copy-paste is not good for style, so I will add things like: - If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old MXIDs from a table, the + As in the case with XIDs, it is possible for autovacuum to fail to [...] It might least be good for readability to gloss over the warning and only quote the MXID limit error message, but we'll have to see how it looks. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
