On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:43 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:
> I agree that this matters at the level of whole indexes. > I already realized my mistake – indeed, having multiple errors for 1 index doesn't seem to be super practically helpful. > I think that that problem should be solved at a higher level, in the > program that runs amcheck. Note that pg_amcheck will already do this > for B-Tree indexes. > That's a great tool, and it's great it supports parallelization, very useful on large machines. > We should add a "Tip" to the amcheck documentation on 14+ about this. > We should clearly advise users that they should probably just use > pg_amcheck. and with -j$N, with high $N (unless it's production)
