Hi, On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:56:47PM -0800, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:43 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > I think that that problem should be solved at a higher level, in the > > program that runs amcheck. Note that pg_amcheck will already do this > > for B-Tree indexes. > > That's a great tool, and it's great it supports parallelization, very useful > on large machines.
Right, but unfortunately not an option on managed services. It's clear that this restriction should not be a general guideline for Postgres development, but it makes the amcheck extension (that is now shipped everywhere due to being in-code I believe) somewhat less useful for use-case of checking your whole database for corruption. Michael
