> From: Pierre Chevalier Géologue [mailto:pierrechevalierg...@free.fr] > ... > > Then I think you've seriously misunderstood. Most people can indeed > >learn to write basic SQL queries, but those are > >(obviously) not what I'm talking about. > > > > To write the business logic of a significant application entirely in > >SQL requires PLSQL (or in other dialects, whatever passes for SQL/PSM). > >It means writing an entire data access layer as a set of stored > >procedures, with a substantial set of special functions, types, > >triggers and so on. No beginner and few experts have the skills > >required to do that in SQL, and then debug that code on the server. > > All right, I understand better now. I think I also totally missed your > point, sorry... > I'll give a look at andl.
I hope you do. Please feel free to contact me with any comments, suggestions, etc. I have not completed the Postgres implementation -- probably another couple of weeks -- but in-memory and Sqlite are there. Bonne chance! Regards David M Bennett FACS Andl - A New Database Language - andl.org -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
