> On Apr 27, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote: > > On 04/27/2016 01:22 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: >> I have an app that would benefit from being able to use pg_partman rather >> than doing it's own ad-hoc partition management. >> >> Unfortunately, some of the places where the app needs to run don't have root >> access to the database server filesystem, so I can't install the extension >> in the postgresql extensions directory. >> >> I could get all the pg_partman functionality by modifying the extension SQL >> script to remove the extension functionality and installing the functions in >> it manually, but then I can't take advantage of the extension features for >> backups, config tables, upgrades and so on - and it's probably not going to >> interact well if someone does a "create extension pg_partman" in the >> database. >> >> Is there any way to install an extension either from a SQL connection or >> from a user-defined directory instead of .../extensions? > > Have not tried it, but you might want to take a look at: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/interactive/extend-extensions.html > > A control file can set the following parameters: > > directory (string) > > The directory containing the extension's SQL script file(s). Unless an > absolute path is given, the name is relative to the installation's SHAREDIR > directory. The default behavior is equivalent to specifying directory = > 'extension'.
That's a useful feature, for sure, but I think the control file itself still needs to be in the .../extensions directory. Cheers, Steve -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general