On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:01:29 +0100 Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:45, A. Kretschmer > <andreas.kretsch...@schollglas.com> wrote: > > In response to Magnus Hagander : > >> 2010/1/21 Bjørn T Johansen <b...@havleik.no>: > >> > We are going to be setting up a PostgreSQL server on a guest under > >> > VMWare ESX 4... Is there any performance improvement by choosing 64bits > >> > Linux over 32bits Linux as the guest OS or is it almost the same? > >> > >> How much resources do you plan to give the machine? > >> > >> If you're setting up a very constrained machine with little memory, go > >> with the 32-bit version. It'll use slightly less memory which can be > >> important if you're constrained. > >> > >> If you're setting up a medium size or bigger machine (2Gb+ memory), > >> use a 64-bit version. If you plan you may eventually need to increase > > > > Really? With ONLY 2Gb? Why? What is the performance improvement, with > > 64Bit all pointers and so on needs more memory so i'm expecting lesser > > memory for the data. > > > > I'm wrong? > > While the theoretical limit is a bit higher, the fact that you have to > reinstall once you've realized you wanted to add a little bit more > memory.... More important to me at least :-) > I also thought that the fact the 64bit system can move more data in parallell would also make the system faster.... BTJ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
