On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * DelGurth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Seems Tomasz linked to the wrong patch. The patch he meant was: >> http://drupal.org/files/issues/drupal_lookup_path-6.x.patch.txt > > That's much better. > >> Also nice to see people "benchmark" differences by just executing a >> query once[2][3].... > > This thread is insane.. Is every change to drupal run through this kind > of design-by-committee? And the paranoia of a cost difference of 0.09ms > for something which ends up getting cached for one particular storage > engine under one particular database?! > > Makes me worried about drupal's future, heh.
In all fairness, pgsql goes through the same kind of design by committee process. We just have a committee of very smart people hashing things out. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
