>I'll ask, but I think he'll say that the license applies to the source; if >a commercial fork was made, then they are free to hide the source. But if >they ever release the source, then it has to go under the BSD again. What I was asking was, if someone forks the code base, aren't they allowed to change their license? It would only make sense that they distinguish themselves as the developers of the new code fork, right? So, can't the code be forked in such a way that no code changes, and only the license? Rob Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD Lice... Philip Warner
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Samy Elashmawy
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker