On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Philip Warner wrote: > At 08:24 10/07/00 -0400, Robert D. Nelson wrote: > > > >Stupid question time: BSD allows forking of the code base, perhaps to > >proprietary. If going proprietary, I would imagine you could change the > >license. So why can't we have a "license fork"? > > > > I'll ask, but I think he'll say that the license applies to the source; if > a commercial fork was made, then they are free to hide the source. But if > they ever release the source, then it has to go under the BSD again. Actually, my understanding is that even if a commercial fork was made, the original license has to be visible *somewhere*, even if its just the COPYRIGHT file itself ...
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD Lice... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD ... Philip Warner
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Samy Elashmawy
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker