On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Robert D. Nelson wrote: > >I'll ask, but I think he'll say that the license applies to the source; if > >a commercial fork was made, then they are free to hide the source. But if > >they ever release the source, then it has to go under the BSD again. > > What I was asking was, if someone forks the code base, aren't they allowed > to change their license? It would only make sense that they distinguish > themselves as the developers of the new code fork, right? no they can't ... they can add to the current license, but they can't remove it ...
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD Lice... Philip Warner
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Samy Elashmawy
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker