>Recently, Landmark/Great Bridge sent us a proposed revision to our >existing license that, from what I can tell, has two paragraphs that >pretty instantly none of the non-US developers felt comfortable with ... >and that I, personally, could never agree to. Sorry to jump in , but which two paragraphs were these and why were they objectionable ?
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD Lice... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD ... Philip Warner
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Samy Elashmawy
- Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License John Daniels
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Philip Warner
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License Robert D. Nelson
- RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL & the BSD License The Hermit Hacker