Magnus Hagander wrote: > 2009/10/13 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> Actually, I found a note that said it's recommended to never increase >>>> it about 65535 - so perhaps we should put our limit at that instead od >>>> 32767? >>> Yeah, setting it at 65535 seems like a good idea then. I'm tempted to >>> backport this, although it's not strictly speaking a bug fix. Any >>> objections? >> Why isn't it a bug fix? +1 for backport ... > > Yeah, +1 there.
Ok, committed. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
