2009/10/13 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Actually, I found a note that said it's recommended to never increase >>> it about 65535 - so perhaps we should put our limit at that instead od >>> 32767? > >> Yeah, setting it at 65535 seems like a good idea then. I'm tempted to >> backport this, although it's not strictly speaking a bug fix. Any >> objections? > > Why isn't it a bug fix? +1 for backport ...
Yeah, +1 there. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
