Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> A small wish in case we go with this: The constant should be named
> something like PG_...; otherwise it looks like we are defining or
> overriding an official symbol from the GSS API.
I'd be inclined to just s/2000/32767/ and not bother with a symbol,
misleadingly named or otherwise. If the value were actually being
used in more than one place, it'd be a different story, but to be
so used it would likely need a completely different name.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
