Tom Lane: > I'd be inclined to just s/2000/32767/ and not bother with a symbol,
Heikki Linnakangas: > The corresponding limit in pg_SSPI_recvauth() probably needs to be > raised too.. Magnus Hagander: > Actually, I found a note that said it's recommended to never increase > it [above] 65535 - so perhaps we should put our limit at that instead > [of] 32767? Perhaps the thing to do is to use a symbol, set its value to 65535, and use the same symbol for all of GSS, SSPI, and KRB5. --Ian -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs