Ray Hallsworth wrote:
> I have only ever been to a meeting once (January 2009) with a 
> friend from work.The cool reception that met us made my fridge 
> temperature seem like a tropical heatwave ! Although we did manage to 
> talk to two people (eventually), I received the distinct impression that 
> we were not welcome and that the LUG wanted to become a closed club 
> where the members could freely do there own thing in peace from 
> strangers asking stupid questions.

... and Steve Tompkins-MacQueen wrote:
> I did not find the welcome cold but I sit down and at first thought OK what 
> now.   Like meny informail meeting it is a little difcalt as one douse not 
> know how to behave.
I recognise Steve's picture, and definitely not Ray's although I am very 
grateful for Ray sharing it, as it's fine for me to say that he got the 
wrong impression but the fact that he got that impression is for us to fix.

PLUG is very much leaderless and rudderless (no particular aims and no 
means for steering towards them anyway). This should change, it just 
needs someone to change it!

I am very grateful to Tony for making his room available for meetings (I 
don't recall where we were meeting back in January but I assume it was 
at my company's workshop, and I can understand Tony's frustration in 
making the venue available and staying late for every meeting only to 
have one or two people show up - remember that the host doesn't get to 
decide to miss occasional meetings like the rest of us do). The LINX 
meeting room is an ideal venue to actually do the things a LUG should be 
doing - demonstrations, talks, etc, although we're not doing a great job 
of organising these things. To some extent this is a chicken and egg 
problem - with the LUG as it is right now I would be wary of inviting an 
outside speaker in to give a talk, but without doing this it'll be hard 
to change the dynamic of the group.

Perhaps now would be a good time for those who do not attend meetings 
(and probably don't say much here on the list either) to say why they 
don't attend and what they'd like to see happen at the meetings?

For my part, as someone whose attendance has dropped considerably, I'll 
be brutally honest and say that I've never seen PLUG as a primarily 
social meeting, and from a Linux perspective I don't really get much 
from the meetings, nor do I find myself really in a position to give 
much back at meetings any more. I still attend when I can but it's 
dropped down my priority list. I'd like a reason for it to go back up again.

There are outside speakers, on subjects like using Linux for computer 
forensics and data recovery, for example, who do the rounds and may well 
be prepared to come to PLUG meeting in return for petrol money and 
coffee. I'd like to attend such meetings. I'm also quite happy to help 
newcomers with installations etc, and if anyone has a subject they'd 
like covered I might even be able to give a presentation on a subject 
(as could many others here). Speaking personally, what I am not good at 
is taking command of a meeting and grabbing attention, and the end 
result is that if I am "in charge" then the meeting falls apart into 
separate groups talking about different (often non-Linux) subjects, and 
it's hard for someone like me to drag everyone back into focus.

Maybe we should have bi-monthly meetings, one social (in a pub) and one 
"on-topic" (at LINX or similar)? Or maybe for the time being the monthly 
meets should alternate between pub and LINX? Or maybe I'm the only one 
who would appreciate a more "Help me get more out of Linux" flavour to 
the meetings, rather than "We all use Linux, lets see what else we have 
in common"?

Specifically to Ray: Thanks for sharing your views and as the likely 
host of the meeting you attended, I sincerely apologise for the way you 
felt at the meeting you attended. I'd like to ask you to help us 
understand what you would like from a meeting and then attend again to 
see if we can deliver?

To PLUG generally: Most people who felt like Ray did would have left the 
mailing list and wouldn't have voiced their views. The fact that he's 
stuck with Linux, stuck with the list, and has shared his comments, 
probably means he's very much someone we need on board!

-- 
Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450
Registered in England (0456 0902) @ 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG


_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

Reply via email to