On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, John Porter wrote: > Yes. OTOH, if it doesn't add *enough* information, it's not cost- > effective. Most of proposals, such as highlander types and this 109, > reduce the amount of info carried by the symbol to the point that it > isn't worth having. Furthermore, if the OO nature of perl, as > foreshadowed by perl5's tie-ing and lvalue subs, realizes its full > potential, then being a "scalar", as indicated by a $, conveys > essentially zero information. Composer::Post.assumes(Iterator.each(Iterator.all(List)=="Programmers") ->programs=(Language::Programming.uses("Perl")==true && Methodology.implemented(Style.OO==true,Time.all==true)))==true; -- Bryan C. Warnock ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Karl Glazebrook