My point is that I find the use of $x and @x visually confusing, and now arrays are often objects anyway really confusing. Also lots of $$x{'hmm'] and \@x[...] are no good. This human wants less clutter! Karl Dan Sugalski wrote: > The ultimate target of a program's source code is the *programmer*. > Programmers, being people (well, more or less... :), work best with symbols > and rich context. Stripping contextual clues out of code does the > programmer a disservice. We're at the point where we don't have to cater to > the limitations of the computer hardware. That means we'll be better off if > we cater to the limitations (and strengths!) of people's wetware. > > Let's not move backwards and force people to work like machines. Instead, > lets force machines to work like us. > > Dan > > --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- > Dan Sugalski even samurai > [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even > teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Clayton Scott
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Karl Glazebrook