John Porter wrote: > > Karl Glazebrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > This RFC proposes that C<$x>, C<@x>, and C<%x> be ditched and > > replaced with C<$x> for everything. > > > > The only distinction left would be between things which are > > variables (prefixed by C<$>) and not-variables (subroutines and > > keywords). > > A useless distinction at the lexical level. Get rid of "$" too. > x is a symbol; perl can look up what it means. > > -- > John Porter It may be useful on a human level though. I agree that would be another solution - even more radical than my proposal. Karl
- RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... David Corbin