Nathan Wiger wrote: > > This is one of the things I really like about Perl: being able to tell > what type of thing I'm looking at. Is is a list? A single value? A hash > of values? No sweat, look at the prefix. I appreciate the point. I discuss it in the RFC and why I think it no longer works. I hope people will actually read the RFC before coming back with these canned responses which I (and presumably everyone else on this list) am completely familiar with. I used to believe that too! Honest... I am looking forward to reading some *real* criticisms... Karl
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - l... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Clayton Scott
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - l... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - l... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Damien Neil