At 02:18 PM 8/2/00 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From a language perspective, I have a scheme to allow us to yank all the > > cruft (sockets, shm, messages, localtime...) out into separate libraries, > > yet pull them in on demand without needing a use. > >a la dbmopen in perl5? A step beyond that. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Dan Sugalski
- Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Piers Cawley
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Bryan C . Warnock
- Memory Footprint of Perl System Calls... mooring
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Nathan Torkington
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Damian Conway
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... Matt Sergeant