At 12:24 PM 8/2/00 +0900, Simon Cozens wrote: >On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:01:14PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Right, I know the underside will be yanked and redone. (Hopefully with > > async support on platforms that have it to do some I/O and processing > > overlap) It's not getting removed from the core language from a perl > > programmer standpoint, though. Beefed up with disciplines and stuff, > rather > > than removed. > >Egads no. IO's what Perl's for. Right. That was my point. (The original poster wanted to pull IO out of the core entirely) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Bart Lateur
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Simon Cozens
- Stuff in core (was Re: date inte... Dan Sugalski
- Stuff in core (was Re: date inte... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Piers Cawley
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Bryan C . Warnock
- Memory Footprint of Perl System Calls (wa... mooring