On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:39:28PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I like perl's smart built-in IO just fine, thanks. :) Don't mind making it > better, but I do mind making it optional. If we're going to do line disciplines, we need a built-in stdio replacement. Full ground-up rewrite, like sfio but Perlish. -- [Bastille Linux] Of course, if we consider the relative ease with which the historical Bastille was taken by a bunch of peasants, maybe there's not much difference between the two. - Jonathan Byrne.
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Graham Barr
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Tim Jenness
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Bart Lateur
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Dan Sugalski
- Stuff in core (was Re: date inte... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Piers Cawley
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Nick Ing-Simmons