Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 09:01 AM 8/3/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >Syscalls should use errno. Others may vary. > > If we get a good-looking exception throwing/catching mechanism and > syntax, this may not matter. try { java } catch (Exception e) { think again } -- Johan
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opend... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Steve Simmons
- try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Mod... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Hildo Biersma
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Graham Barr
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Graham Barr
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Nathan Wiger
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Nathan Wiger