On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 05:09:13AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > This is my argument against obsolescing the general-purpose socket() et al. > syscalls in deference to the IO::Socket stuff: Absolutly. A high level API is ok for those who want it. But you should never take away the low-level stuff. > You don't know what blew > up, and lack fine-grained control. (There's also the matter of being > somewhat non-useful for UDP.) Thats just because IO::Socket is done wrong Graham.
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Steve Simmons
- try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open() an... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Hildo Biersma
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Graham Barr
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Graham Barr
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Nathan Wiger
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Nathan Wiger
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Nathan Torkington
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Peter Scott
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Nathan Wiger