On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:01:44AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:13:09AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >> No, that's gross. A failed constructor should return undef. See my > >> later message. > > >That has always been my view. But then people say "but why did it fail" > >and having global variables does not scale well. > > Syscalls should use errno. Others may vary. It's the other may vary that bothers me. Even the core modules can't agree, but that is a discussion for the stdlib list. Graham.
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opend... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Steve Simmons
- try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Mod... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Hildo Biersma
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Graham Barr
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Graham Barr