>On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:13:09AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: >> No, that's gross. A failed constructor should return undef. See my >> later message. >That has always been my view. But then people say "but why did it fail" >and having global variables does not scale well. Syscalls should use errno. Others may vary. --tom
- Re: Don't reply! RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opend... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and o... Steve Simmons
- try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Mod... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Hildo Biersma
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Johan Vromans
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Graham Barr
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC:... Tom Christiansen