Re: Critique available

[Nathan Torkington]

David Grove writes:
> I'm not suggesting censorship. I'm questioning O'Reilly's position.

I don't think this has anything to do with O'Reilly--Mark wrote the
article, and it's on perl.com because of that.  Our rebuttal will
also go there.  O'Reilly hasn't got anything to gain by putting the
article there, or by taking it down.  It's nothing to do with them.

I'd like to leave this finger-pointing thread, and either come up with
constructive ideas for how to use an improved RFC process later (e.g.,
design documents, or change requests) or move onto beginning to get
our house in order for the design work.

Nat