On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:12:50AM -0500, John Porter wrote: > As an RFC author and persistent discutant, I always assumed that > all/most/many of such qualified internals folks would be reading > the perl6 lists, and would squawk when appropriate. On the whole, driving a spike between language and internals by giving them separate lists was not a good idea. -- >Almost any animal is capable learning a stimulus/response association, >given enough repetition. Experimental observation suggests that this isn't true if double-clicking is involved. - Lionel, Malcolm Ray, asr.
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Dave Storrs
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Andy Dougherty
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Critique available Bart Lateur
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Stephen P. Potter