* David Grove ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [03 Nov 2000 07:30]:
> Absolutely and double the vulgarity. I can't imagine that the article
> was posted at all. Several of us (you guys) have _some_ pull at
> O'Reilly... please suggest that the article be pulled. For the company
> that backs perl the most to publish something so disgustingly myopic
> is unconscionable.

Erm. No. A reply article would be much more suitable. Pulling things
would feel like sweeping dirt under the carpet.


cheers,
-- 
\def\Koschei{Iain Truskett}                    % http://eh.org/~koschei/
\def\WhoAmI#1#2#3#4#5#6{\tt#2#3\it#4#5\bf#6\sl!}\def\i{I}\def\f{i}\def\I
{\if\i\f\f\else\i\fi}\def\Am{am}          \WhoAmI?\I\ \Am\ \Koschei\bye!

Reply via email to