* David Grove ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [03 Nov 2000 07:30]: > Absolutely and double the vulgarity. I can't imagine that the article > was posted at all. Several of us (you guys) have _some_ pull at > O'Reilly... please suggest that the article be pulled. For the company > that backs perl the most to publish something so disgustingly myopic > is unconscionable. Erm. No. A reply article would be much more suitable. Pulling things would feel like sweeping dirt under the carpet. cheers, -- \def\Koschei{Iain Truskett} % http://eh.org/~koschei/ \def\WhoAmI#1#2#3#4#5#6{\tt#2#3\it#4#5\bf#6\sl!}\def\i{I}\def\f{i}\def\I {\if\i\f\f\else\i\fi}\def\Am{am} \WhoAmI?\I\ \Am\ \Koschei\bye!
- Re: Critique available Bennett Todd
- Re: Critique available Tad McClellan
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Bennett Todd
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available iain truskett
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Dave Storrs
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Andy Dougherty
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Critique available Bart Lateur