Censorship, the type the I've opposed in the Perl community, is that which
provides the benefit of false impressions (a.k.a. marketing by fraud by
ommission of the truth) for the procurement of the almighty dollar.
I'm not suggesting censorship. I'm questioning O'Reilly's position.
Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 02:01:45PM +0000, David Grove wrote:
> > Absolutely and double the vulgarity. I can't imagine that the article
was
> > posted at all. Several of us (you guys) have _some_ pull at
O'Reilly...
> > please suggest that the article be pulled.
>
> Of course, because censorship is the only way to deal with our
problems!
> Christ, Perl developers shouldn't be allowed to have opinions!
>
> --
> What would happen if you ran up to Hitler and mentioned Usenet?
> - Kibo
