Re: Critique available

[Jarkko Hietaniemi]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:42:34AM +0000, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:14:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Not in the p5p sense, at least. Regardless of the levels of disapproval, 
> > generally the disapproval was voiced with at least some courtesy. p5p is 
> > rather less polite about things.
> 
> I think that's what they call a "false memory". There's been one acrimonious
> thread in the past six months or so.

I must have false memories of p5p since May 1994, then.  Some of them
happy, some of the decidedly not.

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen