Markus Peter wrote: > I'm not sure though wether I like the usage of die to throw fatal > exceptions vs. throw for possibly non-fatal exceptions, especially > considering the fact that many modules currently use die for trivial stuff > like reporting wrong parameters... Once a (more appropriate than die) non-fatal throw/catch mechanism exists, the use of die for non-fatal exceptions would hopefully wither away over time... and if not, appropriate wrappers could be written. -- Glenn ===== There are two kinds of people, those who finish what they start, and so on... -- Robert Byrne _______________________________________________ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- RE: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Brust, Corwin
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Peter Scott
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy