Markus Peter wrote: > > I could not find this in the online RFC 88 - what version are we > talking about? Sorry, it's available as below. This draft hasn't been sent to the RFC index yet because I'm waiting on Peter's comments. Formatted: http://www.avrasoft.com/perl/rfc/rfc88v2d5.htm POD as text: http://www.avrasoft.com/perl/rfc/rfc88v2d5.txt Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Brust, Corwin
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Peter Scott
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy