At 04:06 PM 8/22/00 -0500, Brust, Corwin wrote: >[snip] >-----Original Message----- >From: Markus Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Another way to achieve the same result would be to NOT get rid of the try >part of try/catch and then try automatically implies use fatal for that >block... > >So that was: > > Any exception raised in a try will be fatal unless caught? It already is (RFC 88). -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Brust, Corwin
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Peter Scott
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy